Follow us on social

Trump Mohammed Bin Salman al Saud

Weapons industry cheers as Trump inks Saudi $142B arms deal

Riyadh lands ‘largest defense sales agreement in history’

Reporting | QiOSK

Trump has signed a record breaking foreign arms sale to Saudi Arabia — a package worth nearly $142 billion, which the Trump administration describes as "the largest defense sales agreement in history.”

The White House fact sheet on the deal states the deal will provide Saudi Arabia “with state-of-the-art warfighting equipment and services from over a dozen U.S. defense firms.” Relevant sales from the private sector will occur in the realms of air force and space advancements, air and missile defense, border and coastal security, and communications upgrades.

Signed during his trip to the Kingdom today, the deal is part of a $600 billion Saudi commercial investment package previously floated in January and is directed especially toward American infrastructure, energy, and AI.

“The United States and Saudi Arabia celebrate these and many other deals today as a result of the growing momentum of the last four months. The total package has quickly built to more than $600 billion —the largest set of commercial agreements on record between the two countries,” today’s fact sheet proclaimed.

"The U.S.-Saudi relationship has been a bedrock of security and prosperity," Mr. Trump affirmed today in Riyadh. "Today, we reaffirmed this important bond, and we take the next steps to make our relationship closer, stronger and more powerful than ever before."

But experts wonder how the agreements will shake out. “Although the Saudis allegedly agreed to the largest defense sales agreement in history, similar to the massive amounts of weapons that MBS [Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud] agreed to purchase during Trump's first term, many of these initial commitments may not actually translate into weapons purchases,” Annelle Sheline, Research Fellow in the Middle East program at the Quincy Institute, told Responsible Statecraft.

Indeed, Trump made an arms deal to Saudi Arabia worth $110 billion in 2017 during his previous presidency; in 2018, CNN reported Saudi Arabia had only followed through with about $14.5 billion worth of arms purchases.

Sources told Reuters that the U.S. and Riyadh also discussed Saudi Arabia potentially purchasing advanced F-35 jets from Lockheed Martin. Yet it wasn’t clear whether Washington would permit the purchase, as it would give Riyadh a weapon also used by Israel, which the U.S. has guaranteed more advanced American weapons over its Arab counterparts (otherwise known as the Qualitative Military Edge).

Trump’s arms sale deal was proclaimed in tandem with other major U.S. announcements, including the decision to lift sanctions on the new Syrian government. Trump also expressed hope Saudi Arabia would join the Abraham accords at Riyadh today.

The Trump administration, meanwhile, has publicly floated renaming the Persian Gulf the “Arabian Gulf,” a move likely to please the Saudis he’s making deals with — but likely to upset Iran during tense negotiations regarding its nuclear program.


U.S. President Donald Trump reacts next to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman during the Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, May 13, 2025. REUTERS/Brian Snyder [Reuters Connect]
Reporting | QiOSK
Boeing
Top image credit: EVERETT (WA), USA – JANUARY 30 2015: Unidentified Boeing employees continue work building its latest Boeing 777 jets at its Everett factory (First Class Photography / Shutterstock.com)

A nuclear deal with Iran could generate billions for US economy

Middle East

As the U.S. and Iran engage in fraught rounds of nuclear talks, deep distrust, past failures, and mounting pressure from opponents continue to hinder progress. Washington has reverted to its old zero-enrichment stance, a policy that, in 2010, led Iran to increase uranium enrichment from under 5% to 20%. Tehran remains equally entrenched, insisting, “No enrichment, no deal, No nuclear weapons, we have a deal.”

In Washington, the instinct is to tighten the screws on Tehran, make military threats credible, and explore strike options to force capitulation. Yet history shows that these coercive tactics often fail. Sanctions have not secured compliance and have proven costly to U.S. interests. Military strikes are unlikely to dismantle Iran’s nuclear capabilities; instead, they risk convincing Tehran to pursue the development of nuclear weapons.

keep readingShow less
Moscow shopping
Top photo credit: A cover dance band performs during an event devoted to the Spring Festival, at a shopping mall in Khimki, on the outskirts of Moscow, Russia, February 10, 2024. REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov

Despite war, Moscow is booming

Europe

Russia is no stranger to costly, grinding wars. Soviet authorities made a point of allowing the performing arts to continue during the 872-day battle for Leningrad during World War II, widely considered the bloodiest siege in history.

Thousands of displaced and starving locals flocked to the Mariinsky, Komissarzhevskaya, and other theaters to the unrelenting hum of shelling and air raid sirens. The 1942 Leningrad premiere of Shostakovich's Seventh Symphony stands as both a singular cultural achievement and a grim reminder of Russian tenacity in the face of unspeakable hardship.

keep readingShow less
Donald Trump and Xi Jinping
Top Image Credit: Donald Trump and Xi Jinping (White House photo via Flickr)

Will Trump choose deal or discord with China?

Asia-Pacific

Last week President Trump finally had the phone call with Xi Jinping that he was reportedly “obsessed” with arranging. Today Trump's top trade, treasury, and commerce officials are set to meet a Chinese delegation led by Vice Premier He Lifeng at an undisclosed location in London for talks.

This followed a week of Trump suggesting he would blow up the crucial relationship with China that was only recently steadied after an alarming month of spiraling economic warfare. That began when, without advance warning, Trump posted that China “HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US.” Then at 2am the day before the call, he wrote that Xi is “VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!”

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.