Follow us on social

Chuck Schumer

Activists demand Schumer delete Trump-Iran 'TACO' post

More than two dozen groups called on the NY Democrat to delete a video attacking the president for 'folding' on the talks

Reporting | QiOSK

More than two-dozen national and New York-based organizations on Wednesday urged Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) to retract a social media video that took aim at President Trump over his negotiations with Iran.

In the video, posted on June 2, Schumer attacked Trump for purportedly not being tough enough with Tehran and accusing the administration of negotiating “side deals” out of public view that are allegedly less favorable to the United States.

“If TACO Trump is already folding on Iran, the American people need to know about it. No side deals,” Schumer said, referring to the moniker “Trump Always Chickens Out,” a term lobbed at the president intending to criticize his tariff policies. “When it comes to negotiating with the terrorist government of Iran, Trump’s all over the lot. One day he sounds tough, the next day he’s backing off. And now, all of a sudden, we find out that [special envoy Steve] Witkoff and [Secretary of State Marco] Rubio are negotiating a secret side deal with Iran.”

The groups — including Brooklyn for Peace, Peace Action New York State, Demand Progress, National Iranian American Council Action, and the Quincy Institute, which publishes RS — sent a letter to Schumer on Wednesday singling out the social media post and accusing the Minority Leader of acting “profoundly reckless” on Iran.

“[We] expect that you will treat weighty issues of war and peace as a statesman and with the serious gravity that it deserves,” they wrote. “Unfortunately, your recent social media video seeking to out-hawk President Trump’s negotiations with Iran fails that test.”

They said there are valid reasons to challenge the president, yet “negotiations aimed at ensuring Iran can’t weaponize its nuclear program and preventing war deserve support, not political attacks.”

The letter adds, “We urge you to retract your video and to move in line with the vast majority of Americans who support a deal with Iran and oppose a disastrous war.”

Emily Rubino, Executive Director of Peace Action New York State, said that her organization has been urging Schumer to champion diplomacy over war regardless of who occupies the Oval Office, but “his recent inflammatory comments on Iran do just the opposite.”

Schumer, Rubino added, “should be using his leadership to ensure that transparent and meaningful negotiations are taking place between the U.S. and Iran towards a deal, not to continue stoking the tensions of war.”

“Lives are hanging in the balance as the U.S. and Iran seek to resolve the nuclear crisis at the negotiating table,” said NIAC’s Ryan Costello. “Yet instead of emphasizing the importance of resolving this crisis through diplomacy and not war, Sen. Schumer took a page from Tom Cotton and Mike Pompeo's efforts to sabotage Obama's diplomacy ten years ago, baselessly attacking the negotiations and seeking to goad Trump into maintaining hardline positions that risk war.”

Talks are set to resume this week and Trump himself has recently signaled pessimism about any favorable outcome.

"Iran is acting much differently in negotiations than it did just days ago," Trump said during an interview with Fox News on Tuesday. "Much more aggressive. It’s surprising to me. It’s disappointing, but we are set to meet again tomorrow – we’ll see."

Meanwhile, amid an increasingly bitter dispute between Trump’s more loyal supporters and neoconservatives agitating against a nuclear agreement and pushing for war, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) will reportedly introduce a resolution in the coming days calling for the dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program as the only acceptable outcome of the negotiations, an outcome similar to what Sen. Schumer was advocating in his social media video and one that the president’s supporters, and the groups criticizing Schumer, say is likely to lead to war.


Top image credit: U.S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) attends a press conference following the U.S. Senate Democrats' weekly policy luncheon on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 10, 2025. REUTERS/Kent Nishimura
Reporting | QiOSK
Ukraine military cemetary
Top photo credit: Kharkiv, Ukraine, June 13, 2024 ; Kharkiv military cemetery called Aleya Slavy.

The terrible cost of bringing Ukraine’s bodies home

Europe

A spat over the return of 6,000 Ukrainian bodies lays bare the unforgiving economic and political challenge that Ukraine faces in bringing home its fallen, and the political storm that President Zelensky will face when the war finally ends.

The second round of the Istanbul peace talks on June 2 led to an agreement for Russia and Ukraine to exchange 6,000 bodies. On Sunday, June 8, a convoy of Russian refrigerated lorries arrived at the agreed meeting point in Belarus, with over 1,000 bodies, but the Ukrainian side did not show up. It is not clear that June 8 was the agreed date for the body swap to start, and Ukraine claims that the exchange was due to take place three days later, on June 11. The exchange has now happened, with 1212 Ukrainian soldiers’ bodies exchanged for the bodies of 27 Russians.

keep readingShow less
Wall Street Stock Exchange
Top photo credit: A trader works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange shortly before the closing bell as the market takes a significant dip in New York, U.S., February 25, 2020. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson/File Photo/File Photo

Pushing East Asia to hike defense could boomerang on Wall Street

Asia-Pacific

For years now, the United States has justifiably wanted its allies to pick up a bigger share of the burden of their own defense.

But as America now asks its partners to boost military spending to 5% of GDP, the sheer scale of these demands — especially on allies in East Asia — could push yields higher on U.S. Treasury bonds at a time when they are already under pressure by skeptical global bond investors and ratings agencies.

keep readingShow less
China Navy
Top image credit: Chinese Navy (Massimo Todaro / Shutterstock.com)

Three reasons why China can't afford to invade Taiwan

Asia-Pacific

Taiwan has become a focal point for the U.S.-China conflict, with the Pentagon turning its attention towards a hypothetical conflict with China — referring to it as the “sole pacing threat” — and China continuing combat and blockade drills around the island.

However, despite China’s demonstrations of military power, Taiwan’s unique economic niche and geographic position make it a particularly thorny target for Beijing. The Chinese Communist Party’s legitimacy rests largely on the robust economy it has built, and the direct economic repercussions of an invasion or blockade of Taiwan stand to shatter the foundations of Beijing’s domestic power.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.